Designing and Reporting Experiments in Psychology Peter Harris
     
 
 
 
Designing & Reporting Experiments in Psychology 3/e
 
  Buy this Book  
     
  A. Choosing a statistical test  
  B. Reporting specific inferential statistics  
  C. More on main effects, interactions and graphing interactions  
  D. Rules for writers  
  E. Reporting studies that include questionnaires  
  E1 Studies involving questionnaire  
  E2 Design  
  E3 Questionnaire development  
  E4 Materials  
  E5 Procedure  
  E6 Computer presentation  
  E7 Results  
  E8 Reporting non experimental studies  
  E9 The reliability and validity of your measures  
  E10 An example to help you report studies using Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measures  
  F. Experimental and nonexperimental data: Some things to watch out for  
  G. Some tips for advanced students to improve your experiments yet further  
  H. Some issues to consider in the RESULTS sections of your later reports and your projects  
  I. Final year projects  
     
 
Related Statistics Books
 
  Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual  
     
  Greene & D'Oliveira, Learning to Use Statistical Tests in Psychology  
     
   
Reporting studies that include questionnaires

 

E1 Studies involving questionnaire

The sections of the report described in Part 1 of the book are particularly well designed for reporting experiments towards the laboratory end of the spectrum. However, most experiments and other studies involving questionnaires can be written up within this structure with little or no need to modify it.

Of course, it is possible to run studies using questionnaires in the laboratory (especially where the questionnaire is complex or lengthy and you want to have your participant’s undivided attention). Nevertheless, more often than not, questionnaire-based studies take place outside the laboratory, often in informal settings where it is harder to control the participant’s attention. To caricature the two extremes:

 

The laboratory experiment – this is relatively high on procedure, involving apparatus and perhaps even dramatis personae in the form of confederates or stooges; usually only one or two DVs.

  The questionnaire study – this is relatively low on procedure, involving no apparatus or dramatis personae, may have several DVs and may also have more than one IV, some of which may not truly be independent variables. It may not even be an experiment at all. (To find out more about variables that are not true IVs see Section 13.8 of the book. You can also find some discussion of this issue in Section F of this Web site).

This gives the clue as to where the differences lie in reports of these studies. They lie in the METHOD section, particularly in the MATERIALS, APPARATUS, and PROCEDURE. However, in some cases, the DESIGN and RESULTS may also be different.

Thus, if you have run a study that primarily involves giving a questionnaire to your participants, your report will:

1

probably contain a fairly lengthy MATERIALS, in much of which you describe the contents of the questionnaire

2 probably not have any apparatus to report (unless you used a computer to present the questionnaire)
3 have a pretty short PROCEDURE in which you describe the circumstances of questionnaire administration, the script for any face-to-face interaction that took place, and how and when the completed questionnaires were collected.

Depending on the nature of the questionnaire, it may also:

4

have a modified DESIGN in which you describe the principal DVs, but have no room to describe each DV in detail,

5 contain a fairly lengthy RESULTS, in which you describe the different sets of data and their analyses.

The main difference in reports of these types of experiment, therefore, is in the balance of the material in the different sections.

Summary

1

Experiments involving questionnaires can often be written up with little or no modification to the structure of the report described in the book.

2 The principal differences between questionnaire-based and laboratory-based studies lie in the METHOD and in some cases the DESIGN and RESULTS.

 

 

 

 

Open University PressMcGraw-Hill logo