Designing and Reporting Experiments in Psychology Peter Harris
     
 
 
 
Designing & Reporting Experiments in Psychology 3/e
 
  Buy this Book  
     
  A. Choosing a statistical test  
  B. Reporting specific inferential statistics  
  C. More on main effects, interactions and graphing interactions  
  C1 Main effects of independent variables  
  C2 Interactions between independent variables  
  C3 Interpreting main effects and interactions  
  C4 Interactions qualify main effects  
  C5 Graphing interactions  
  C6 Graphing three-way interactions  
  C7 A list of the possible effects in designs with two, three, or four IVs  
  D. Rules for writers  
  E. Reporting studies that include questionnaires  
  F. Experimental and nonexperimental data: Some things to watch out for  
  G. Some tips for advanced students to improve your experiments yet further  
  H. Some issues to consider in the RESULTS sections of your later reports and your projects  
  I. Final year projects  
     
 
Related Statistics Books
 
  Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual  
     
  Greene & D'Oliveira, Learning to Use Statistical Tests in Psychology  
     
   
More on main effects, interactions and graphing interactions

 

C7 A list of the possible effects in designs with two, three, or four IVs

Designs involving more than one IV are commonly analysed using the statistical technique known as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) – see Section B4.2 of this Web site. The standard approach is to test all the possible sources of variation – interactions as well as main effects – for statistical significance. Table C5 lists the main effects and interactions that you can get for experiments with two, three and four IVs. Note that you do not need to know whether the IVs use unrelated or related samples in order to be able to predict how many main effects and interactions there can be. (You do, however, need to know this in order to know how to analyse them properly.) Nor do you need to know how many levels there are on each IV. Note also that whereas there is potentially one main effect for every IV in the design, after two IVs, each further IV increases the number of potential interactions by more than one, and the more IVs that you have, the more interactions are added each time you add another IV. The complexity this generates for designing your study and interpreting your findings is one reason why I cautioned you in the book against designing experiments involving more than three IVs. Another reason – and the main one – is the difficulty of interpreting three- or four-way interactions.

Summary

1

Experiments with three or more IVs can have several statistically significant interactions.

2 A statistically significant three-way interaction indicates that the two-way interaction is different at the levels of a third IV.
3 It is difficult to interpret interactions between three or more IVs. So, as a general rule you would be well advised to keep the number of IVs you manipulate in one experiment to a maximum of three.

Table C5
The Potential Main Effects and Interactions in Designs Employing Two to Four Independent Variables

     
Experiment with 2 IVs

Potential main effects:

IV1
    IV2
  Potential two-way interaction: IV1 x IV2
     
     
Experiment with 3 IVs Potential main effects: IV1
    IV2
    IV3
     
  Potential two-way interactions: IV1 x IV2
    IV1 x IV3
    IV2 x IV3
     
  Potential three-way interaction: IV1 x IV2 x IV3
     
     
Experiment with 4 IVs Potential main effects: IV1
    IV2
    IV3
    IV4
     
  Potential two-way interactions: IV1 x IV2
    IV1 x IV3
    IV1 x IV4
    IV2 x IV3
    IV2 x IV4
    IV3 x IV4
     
  Potential three-way interactions: IV1 x IV2 x IV3
    IV1 x IV2 x IV4
    IV1 x IV3 x IV4
    IV2 x IV3 x IV4
     
  Potential four-way interaction: IV1 x IV2 x IV3 x IV4
     

You can use Table C5 to check against your analyses when you run experiments involving the simultaneous manipulation of two, three or four IVs. It gives you the maximum number of main effects and interactions possible with such designs. If you find that Table C5 mentions an effect that does not appear in your output – and you are sure that you are not simply misreading your output – likely explanations for this are that either you do not have data for all the possible combinations of the levels of your IVs or something is wrong with the way that you specified the analysis.

When you analyse your findings you can find any or all of the effects displayed in Table C5 are statistically significant. That is, the main effect plus any or all of the interactions involving the same IV may be statistically significant, or that only the main effect, but not any of the interactions involving that IV, are statistically significant, or there may be no statistically significant main effect, but some or all of the interactions involving that IV may be statistically significant.

 

 

Open University PressMcGraw-Hill logo