|
Tommy
Hilfiger
Primary
Topic: Brands
Title:
Tommy Hilfiger
Source:
Business Week April 24, 2000 P. 55
Summary:
The
Tommy Hilfiger brand will have flat sales, but 40% lower
profits. The culprit: getting away from his customers. Attempting
to expand, the brand went on numerous extensions including
perfumes, linen, and infant clothes. Distribution was pushed
into over 10,000 department stores including discount outlets.
Advertising went from the hottest rap groups to endorsers
such as Rolling Stones and Britney Spears. These moves may
move product, but they undermine profitability and street
credibility.
Question:
This
problem is not new to the Tommy brand. Many other hip brands
have faltered when they grew by moving away from their original
market. On the other hand Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren
have had very successful growth.
Compare
and contrast the brand strategies for Tommy vs. Ralph.
To
read similar stories and to keep up-to-date with new developments,
visit mad.co.uk
for breaking news in marketing.
|