|
Case
8
No accounting for inflation
Is an annual interest
rate of 8 per cent high or low? It all depends on inflation. If inflation
is zero, savers would be delighted to earn 8 per cent a year. If annual
inflation is 20 per cent, savers have to earn 20 per a year just to stand
still. Only interest rates above 20 per cent offer a 'real' return.
The 'real interest
rate' is the actual or nominal interest rate minus the inflation rate
over the corresponding period. Positive real interest rates imply that,
properly measured, savers earn a reward and borrowers pay a cost. Negative
real interest rates mean that nominal interest rates are insufficient
to compensate for inflation. Savers lose out, and borrowers are benefit!
If people care ultimately
about the quantity of goods and services they can afford, only inflation-adjusted
measures are relevant. This applies as much to interest rates as to anything
else. Yet many people fail to understand this, or fall into common traps.
At present, much
of the public discussion about private pensions is simply wrong. Maybe
you think you are too young to find this an interesting example. Your
parents will probably disagree, and you should start to master the analysis
yourself pretty soon. People investing in private pensions used to be
told that returns were high - perhaps 10 per cent a year. Now interest
rates are much lower, perhaps only 5 per cent. So the newspapers are full
of articles moaning about poor returns on private pensions in the future.
However, doorstep
sellers of private pensions had not been drawing attention to the fact
that 10 per cent a year was previously not a high real return when inflation
averaged around 10 per cent. Nor do they emphasise that a nominal return
of 5 per cent from now on may not be that different in real terms provided
future inflation stays low. Since many countries have handed over monetary
policy to independent central banks, this may well be the case.
Another reason people
are so easily misled is the way pensions are eventually paid out. Whatever
funds have been accumulated in a private fund by the retirement date,
these are then used to buy an annuity - a contract that pays out a constant
nominal amount each year for the remainder of the person's life. Suppose
the fund is £100000. When inflation is high and nominal interest rates
are say 10 per cent, perhaps the fund pays £12000 a year to the retired
person (if they lived for ever, it could pay £10000 or 10 percent; since
the person will die, it can also use up the capital and pay a bit more).
£12000 seems a lot
the first year, but having lived for 12 further years, the person is still
only getting £12000 a year even though the price level has trebled because
of 10 years of inflation since retirement. Inflation makes the real
value of the annuity's income in later years become low, in exchange
for which the real
value in early years can be very high. If the person lives 20 years
beyond retirement, the real value of the pension may become very small
indeed.
If there was no inflation
and nominal interest rates were much lower, the same initial fund of £100000
might buy an annuity of say only £3000 per annum. The first year this
is less generous than when interest rates were higher, but now the real
value stays constant because there is no inflation. After a few years,
this contract is paying out
more in real terms than the £12000 eroded by years of high
inflation.
Many sellers of pensions,
and most journalists who write about them, get this all wrong. They tell
people that the low-inflation, low-interest-rate scenario is now hurting
people because the nominal
value of the annuity has been reduced. This just shows that
they don't know how to think about the problem in the first place.
Lower inflation allows
nominal annuities to pay their true real returns in a manner more evenly
spread out over the person's retirement. High inflation effectively skews
the real payout into the early years. Controlling for this difference,
the other key thing is the level of real
interest rates in general. Higher real interest rates allow savers
to et a better total return in real terms.
When inflation is
rising, real interest rates are often quite low. When inflation is falling,
real interest rates are often abnormally high (since tough monetary policy
and high interest rates is often the way that inflation is brought down
again). But there is no simple relationship between the level
of inflation and the level
of real interest rates (because inflation on average is usually
reflected appropriately in nominal interest rates).
The weekend we wrote
this case study, yet another UK Sunday newspapers wrote an article that
analysed pensions and interest rates incorrectly. We could have said the
same most previous weekends as well. Try turning to the Money or Personal
Finance section of your weekend newspaper, and see if they are doing any
better. Meanwhile, insurance companies such as Legal & General are responding
to the widespread belief that rates of return on pensions are now low.
In spring 2000, L&G announced a new 'with profits' pension that replaces
the constant-income annuity with a fund whose real value rises over time
as its stock market portfolio rises (see L&G's
Pension website).
QUESTIONS
FOR DISCUSSION
- A mortgage
usually makes people repay constant nominal annual amounts.
If there is any inflation, nominal interest rates are higher
but people's nominal incomes increase over time. How does inflation
skew the annual real annual burden of repayments if nominal
repayments are constant? Would this make inflation-indexed contracts
offering constant levels of real repayment more sensible?
- Why might
lenders have been reluctant to offer these types of mortgage?
|
|